Quote of the day will go here!
Home | GNP Articles | The O'Really Factor | The Duke | Mspencer | Forums | World Map | Links
» is it the age of the autocrat? From GNP Duke_Qa
Posted September 7, 2008. By duke_Qa
http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/is-this-t...yf.html?page=-1

"ARE WE entering the age of the autocrat?
It's certainly tempting to think so after watching
Russia's recent clobbering of Georgia. That invasion
clearly marks a new phase in world politics, but it's
a mistake to think that the future belongs to Russian
strongman Vladimir Putin and his fellow despots."

Although i can't say I'm a big fan of Fukuyama's neoconservative position, this philosophical angle on the future i can agree upon. as mentioned earlier, the world looks like it's in for a new sort of conflict this century. And although I'm generally sceptical to such outcomes, I like to think that this is one of the better outcomes.

0 Comments


» The Renaissance of fascism? From GNP Duke_Qa
Posted August 9, 2008. By duke_Qa
This is more or less a summary of an norwegian article written by Erling Dokk Holm. But i found it to be extremely enlightening and wish to share if with you.


When Amnesty International criticizes China for breaking vital human rights, it sounds great in our western ears. But in a large amount of countries this criticism falls on deaf ears. China stands as a model of how a state should be organized. A strong centralized government that does not allow political opposition or individual freedom in the political field, still manages to keep the wheels spinning. Ten percent economic growth, year after year, is an argument hard to match.

Once upon a time - that is during the aftershocks of the ending of the cold war and the collapse of Soviet -practically everybody thoguht that the western democratic model would become the standard model for governments. The american philosopher Francis Fukuyama gained world celebrity in 1992 by postulating: "what we may be witnessing is (...) the end point of mankind's ideological evolution and the universalization of western liberal democracy as the final form of human government".

[...]

China is in many fields today most likely the worlds most capitalistic society. Workers without independent unions to protect themselves, the capitalist have very little to worry about. Competition between children, even at kindergarten-age, are extreme. And even the most competition-oriented western parents would be apalled if they got to see what their children would have to go through to gain success in the Chinese system. The chinese leaders are not just holding their 1.4 billion citizens together with the help of suppression and control, but also patriotism. how much support the system has nobody knows, but its not unlikely that the communist party would have won an free election.

200 years ago Great Britain became the world's leading superpower. throughout the entire medieval age and up to that time china had the biggest amount of power. the biggest amount of citizens, the biggest territory, the most developed economy, the most advanced industry, the most sofisticated government, no other nation could reach China. Although China have been invaded many times and its influences and borders have varied in size, the central government have been very stable, compared to the chaos of royalties and kingdoms in Europe.

The Olympics shows us that this 200 year break has now ended. the Chinese are back, and it should not surprise anyone that they have returned. The Chinese model works, its a neat package og market economy, suppression and nationalism. Russia under Putin adopted a related form of this model and it worked out alot better for them than during Jeltzins west-european democracy-model. A large number of countries looks up to China. The countries of the middle east especially. What makes matters worse is that the Chinese model looks alot like Fascism, and its this beast that we see the contours of under the waving Chinese flag. It takes time to realign and see the world as it really is, but the fact is that its about time to give up the dream that China will become like us, and rather admit that Fascism is the ruling system of the 21st century.


So, wow. this article really turns my view upon ourselves around. mixed together with Russia attacking Georgia now, we in the west are in for a much darker time than what we have anticipated. If Russia continues down the path of fascism together with China, we will quickly be outmaneuvered by hard-line governments that have the right to kill their own citizens in the name of victory over other opposing nations.

The two biggest elements to change this development is imo:

  1. Spreading knowledge of democracy and freedom to the grass-root of such countries, making the wish for more freedom an dangerous undercurrent to the aforementioned countries.
  2. Keeping up our own economic growth and influences with more and more hard-line and neoconservative thinking, ultimately gazing into the abyss long enough to become a monster ourselves.
Personally i can't really imagine how things will look in a few decades. We are still somewhat on top, but we are looking at a potential humanitarian loss beyond imagination. It might be the turning point of civilization as we know it, and it is the stuff of legends. it is a reprise of the political climate before world war two imo, and i don't like it whatsoever.

4 Comments


» Why I believe Kosovo is Serbia From GNP Articles
Posted August 1, 2008. By Kacen
(Someone please move this thread to the appropriate forum, and allow me to post threads there.)

I've been researching and I realize the grave mistake we made in Kosovo. It was wrong.

Imagine if Canadians started steadily immigrating into North Dakota, and then they made the "North Dakota liberation army", and tried to take it for themselves. (This is not meant to offend Canadians, just used as an example.) We tried to stop them, but then the U.N. intervened and helped the Canadians take part of our country from us.

I'd be pissed off as hell. I sympathize with the Serbians.

It was wrong for us to help Kosovo they had NO right to take it from Serbia.

Radovan Karadžić should be freed he was just trying to protect his country.

What we did caused Serbia and Eastern Europe to hate our guts it should be reversed!

97 Comments


» Warmongering: An elaborate list From GNP MSpencer
Posted July 7, 2008. By MSpencer
I've decided I'd like to keep track of all these crazy things the neocons say, specifically about war, World War III, terrorism, Iran, pre-emptive strikes, and shock and awe. I think by not having a list like this, we all slipped up back in 2003, and I think now more than ever we really need to keep track of what people are saying in Washington. I'll keep this post updated and post below that I've added more.

Starting from early June:

1. Daniel Pipes (Link)
Specifically on the topic of Iran:
QUOTE
What I suspect will be the case is, should the Democratic nominee win in November, President Bush will do something. And should it be Mr. McCain that wins, he'll punt, and let McCain decide what to do.

In other words, if you vote for Barack Obama this November and he wins, George Bush will flip and start World War III.

2. Bill Kristol and Chris Wallace, Faux News (Link)
QUOTE
KRISTOL: I think honestly, if the president felt John McCain were going to be the next president he would think it more appropriate to let the next president make that decision than do it on his way out. I do wonder with Sen. Obama, if president Bush thinks Sen, Obama win does he somehow think that, does he worry that Obama won't follow through on the policy…

WALLACE: So, you're suggesting that he might in fact, if Obama's going to win the election, either before or after the election—launch a military strike?

KRISTOL: I don't know. I think he would worry about it. On the other hand, you can't, it's hard to make foreign policy based on guesses about election results...
Self-explanatory. If Obama wins, George wants to make sure Iran as a threat is completely nullified. Instead of allowing the President elect to have a say in this, it would be a far more reasonable if he spent his last two months in office bombing Iran with what's left of the US military. Hey, the Air Force and the Navy are doing fine (Except for enlistment being down... massively, and funding being diverted to the Army and public corruption in Iraq).

3. John Bolton (Link)
QUOTE
Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton believes Israel will stage a raid against Iran's nuclear facilities if Democratic nominee Barack Obama wins the upcoming presidential election in November.

Bolton, often labeled a resolute neo-conservative, believes the Israeli attack would take place sometime between the day after Obama's win and his inauguration on January 20 of next year.
We all know the US had something to do with the Osirak raid, and if for some reason, Obama wins, we're going to help them launch another one?


More to come, no doubt.

3 Comments


» Do they ever learn? From GNP MSpencer
Posted July 7, 2008. By MSpencer
I don't think I can even properly introduce this one.
David Vitter and Larry Craig name themselves cosponsors of a proposed constitutional amendment which would ban gay marriage.
The people embroiled at the center of two of the most entertaining extramarital affairs in recent political memory have thrown their backing behind an amendment which nobody in the western world, except America, would ever really consider.
This just... really... really makes my day.

David Vitter was the one who was implicated in the DC Madam files as being a high profile client of a massive prostitution ring.
But Larry Craig's the more interesting one; he was censured for verbally assaulting Barney Frank (D-MA) for his sexual orientation (He's the only openly gay representative in American history, I think). He was also one of the most outspoken against Bill Clinton's little slip of the pants and was one of the driving forces behind the Defence of Marriage Act, and ten years later, he's caught propositioning a man for oral sex in an airport bathroom.
I love hypocrisy, especially when it continues for... years.

Of course, America needs this amendment. America needs to prevent things like this from happening.
QUOTE (CNN)
Breaking ground is nothing new in the nearly six-decade relationship of Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon.

The lesbian couple were the first to participate in a 2004 challenge of California laws against same-sex marriage, exchanging wedding vows only to see the ceremony voided later.

But on Monday, Martin, 87, and Lyon, 84, exchanged vows again. This time, California law -- at least for now -- was on their side.

(snip)

"When you consider these two women, who have been denied their rights for 55 years -- put yourself in their shoes and you start to feel a little bit differently," said Newsom, adding that allowing gay and lesbians to marry is about giving them the respect and dignity they deserve.

Thankfully, we have good, upstanding people like Larry Craig and David Vitter who are always on the watch for evil anti-American ideals like the marriage of two octogenarians who just happen to both be women.
Am I one of the only people that doesn't see a problem with this? Or am I the only one who realizes that allowing two men or two women to marry doesn't mean you're going to allow people to marry chihuahuas?

25 Comments


» religious science teacher troll brands his students with crosses From GNP Duke_Qa
Posted June 20, 2008. By duke_Qa
so here we are. perfect example of a man with brains used in the wrong way. he found faith before science, and quickly understood that science is the enemy of faith. "how do we stop this?" he thinks, and comes to the conclusion "we must infiltrate the schools and make sure science is kept down, FOR LORD JEBUZ!".


Plenty of complaints on this guy. saying carbon 14 dating is unstable, supporting creationisism during science classes... And finally, got the school sued for burning a cross onto a students hand with some high frequency tool.

The school board has now apparently voted unamiously to fire the teacher, but we'll see what happens. Because his friend is defending him from the accuses, claiming that he "is teaching the values of the parents in the Mount Vernon school district."

link


bleh, its time to go to bed, figured i post this real quick. not very objective comments from me, but i found it interesting.

8 Comments


» McCain's Blunders - Week 1 From GNP MSpencer
Posted June 10, 2008. By MSpencer
So, now we're going to start a new segment on the unmitigated idiocy of John McCain. It's very simple; John McCain, under no circumstances, should become President of the United States. Why? Isn't it evident? The man says we should stay in Iraq for 1,000 years, but Army leaders acknowledge that the US Army is at its breaking point, and is unable to undertake another mission in defence of the United States; he claims that Americans are no longer dying in Iraq, but three American soldiers were just killed the other day by Iraqi insurgents; he pulls out rhetoric about corporate tax breaks, one of the Bush administration's greatest contributions to the current financial situation, claiming they will help Americans, but corporate handouts and pandering will not help the average American in any way.
John McCain is not only a shouting lunatic who at one point advocated bombing Iran, but he is a corrupt powermonger who is deep in the pockets of lobbyists.
So, without further ado, Week 1.

What's wrong with John McCain?

1. Oratory skills
I didn't think it was possible to find a worse orator than George Bush, who can usually be likened to a fevered monkey guarding a stash of bananas. However, John McCain, on the eve of Barack Obama's victory, decided he would go head to head with the presumptive Democratic nominee, and delivered a quite "moving" speech. In front of a pea-green background, giving his skin a lovely "zombie-green" tone, he proceeded to "smile" much like a child molester, and gave one of the most substanceless speeches during, not just this race, but this decade. McCain began to list Obama's policies, stating without much emphasis, "That's not change we can believe in," after each one. No explanation, no substance, just... uninspiring, unemphatic rhetoric.

An inspiring man, straight from "The Bride of Chucky"

At the exact same time McCain was rallying his seven or eight supporters (Who you can hear distinctly as being a very small crowd), Obama drove a packed arena in St. Paul wild, the very same arena that will be used for the Republican National Convention.
Is anyone else predicting the end of days for the Republican Party?
Youtube link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3aMDJP4VxY4
And if you watch the video, it even leaves Fox News, the conservative propaganda machine, completely fucking speechless. Completely unbelievable.


2. Not only domestic corruption, but OFFSHORE corruption
Two weeks ago, MSNBC (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24844889) reported that Phil Gramm, McCain's national campaign co-chair and presumptive Secretary of the Treasury, "was being paid by a Swiss bank to lobby Congress about the U.S. mortgage crisis at the same time he was advising McCain about his economic policy."
The New York Times, however, has more.
QUOTE (NYT)
Under pressure from the authorities, UBS is considering whether to divulge the names of up to 20,000 of its well-heeled American clients, according to people close to the inquiry, a step that would have once been unthinkable to Swiss bankers, whose traditions of secrecy date to the Middle Ages.

Federal investigators believe some of the clients may have used offshore accounts at UBS to hide as much as $20 billion in assets from the Internal Revenue Service. Doing so may have enabled these people to dodge at least $300 million in federal taxes on income from those assets, according to a government official connected with the investigation.

(snip)

The case could turn into an embarrassment for Marcel Rohner, the chief executive of UBS and the former head of its private bank, as well as for Phil Gramm, the former Republican senator from Texas who is now the vice chairman of UBS Securities, the Swiss bank's investment banking arm. It also comes at a difficult time for UBS, which is reeling from $37 billion in bad investments, many of them linked to risky American mortgages.

So basically, the people lobbying McCain are trying to use him as an accessory in mass tax fraud which cost the US government $300 million in revenue. And the person who's lobbying for them is a part owner and just happens to be the guy McCain wants as treasury secretary.

There's more from Newsweek:
QUOTE (Newsweek)
McCain's campaign is already distancing itself from some of Gramm's other work for UBS: his involvement in attempts to sell financial products known as "death bonds," which BusinessWeek described last summer as one of "the most macabre investment scheme(s) ever devised by Wall Street." Not long after joining UBS, the Houston Chronicle reported, Gramm helped lobby Texas officials, including Gov. Rick Perry, to sign on to a UBS proposal in which revenue would be generated for a state teachers' retirement fund by selling bonds, whose proceeds would in turn be used to buy annuities and life-insurance policies on retired teachers. UBS would advance money to the retirement fund, then repay itself, compensate bondholders and pocket profits when insurance companies paid off on retirees who died. According to a banking-industry source, who asked for anonymity when discussing a sensitive matter, Gramm was involved in efforts to pitch similar UBS products to other financial institutions.

Gramm's office declined NEWSWEEK's request for comment.
So, more corruption.
And John McCain says he doesn't have any lobbyists on his staff...


Unfortunately, that's about it for last week, next post should come on Sunday.

12 Comments


» Why I Hate Modern Society From GNP Articles
Posted June 7, 2008. By Paradox
There is no other way to put it. Our entire lives are stripped bare, our livelihoods left prone with necks showing to the tiger that is our government. We have rights, ideals and freedoms which we are not permitted to exercise.

" A right that can't be defended is a right that exists only in name. In Britain there is, in effect, no right to life or property."
It's true. In this country, we have no right or authority, despite the citizen's power of arrest, to do fuck all. We will be tried for injuring our would-be attackers. Despite his eccentricity, Martin should be lauded as a hero for embodying that which our fathers and grandfathers fought for in the first and second world wars. They defended their right to their freedom and property and life and land and so many of them perished in this defence. We, on the other hand, are not even given the opportunity to defend our right to freedom, property and life because of the government we supposedly appointed.

After the miner's strikes were crushed, the people of Britain have no power. Thanks to the draconian rule of Thatcher and her repressive ways, the people of the UK will go along with anything without putting up a fight. We have no freedom, much as our government trumpets that it does.

We are over-taxed, over-priced, over-worked, under-paid, under-valued and under the line of poverty. And yet, we are unable to even defend ourselves from other forms of terror or injury beyond the metaphorical kick in the bollocks that we each receive.

I almost wish there was a God. One who might inspire all sixty million of us Britons to action. But no.

15 Comments


» US vs. Far Left Part I From GNP The O'Really Factor
Posted May 26, 2008. By Hostile
Let's take a moment to take in a huge puff from the doobie called The Far Left. The hypocrisy of thier thinking is fucking staggering. I'll make a few points here as to not bore you all.

Liberals/Athiests- Some of the most hypocritical. Campaign to stop and keep from drilling Anwar in Alaska (google it), yet say nothing when the Chinese are drilling off the coast of the Florida Keys tapping our local oil supply in international waters.

Athiests actually have the time to hire lawyers to stop nativity scenes on the lawn of the local town hall yet do nothing about chartered mosque/schools that violate seperation of church and state.

Don't you people have jobs and shit to attend to? Athiests are a "New Religion." It's the religion of the Godless, Prophets of Naught. Stop doing the bully pulpit preaching. Your attempts to convert are as pathetic as any bible thumper.

Socialsts- They shout "stop tax breaks for huge companies!" Yet do not understand companies don't buy stupid shit for the sake of buying stupid shit like people do. They reinvest in the company and hire more people and then those people have more jobs. Duh!

Gays- Most Americans have no issue with you having the same rights as married people. Simply don't change the definition of the word marriage. Make up your own name like black people made up thier own holiday to replace white mans Christmas. No one argued with that.

You all were smart enough to define the difference between a "top" and a "bottom." Find a new word to describe what you want. Don't call it marriage. For us straight people it's like calling a circle a square.

I'm just right of center and have to scratch my head on FAAAR left people. They are the protectors of the people yet are the most violent protesters against freedom of speech. They throw pies at conservative speakers on campuses. I don't see the reverse being true.

If it did happen they would be labeled Nazis or something.

The left won. You can pick from Obama (far left), Clinton (left of center), or McCain (right of center)

What are you all so pissed off about? Your hijacking of the US education system was a complete success and is now producing some of the stupidest, least educated, and close minded people on the planet.

And if you disagree, someone will run up and throw a pie at you. Or call you a Nazi.

Politics is a circle, if you run to far to the left, you will find yourself on the far right. (dictatorship)

Actors in Hollywood, focus on making movies and not politics. The movies are bad enough as it is, don't allow yourself to be further distracted.

~Hostile

P.S. Yes I made these edited comics by adding my own dialogue. Just to prove I'm not a Bush fan. So sue me...

And knock it off with the political correct shit.

I've added some custom artwork for a few laughs...

42 Comments


» Chinese troops are on the streets of Zimbabwean city From GNP The O'Really Factor
Posted April 19, 2008. By Hostile
I found this to be an interesting read. Chinese troops aiding Mugabe forces. They certainly support the current dictator but usually the chinese don't support nations by sending military advisors (troops) So I found that odd. Another random oddity is I actually have a date tomorrow with a woman from Zimbabwee. Abit ironic I suppose...


QUOTE
By Ian Evans in Cape Town
Saturday, 19 April 2008


Chinese troops have been seen on the streets of Zimbabwe's third largest city, Mutare, according to local witnesses. They were seen patrolling with Zimbabwean soldiers before and during Tuesday's ill-fated general strike called by the opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC).


Earlier, 10 Chinese soldiers armed with pistols checked in at the city's Holiday Inn along with 70 Zimbabwean troops.

One eyewitness, who asked not to be named, said: "We've never seen Chinese soldiers in full regalia on our streets before. The entire delegation took 80 rooms from the hotel, 10 for the Chinese and 70 for Zimbabwean soldiers."

Officially, the Chinese were visiting strategic locations such as border posts, key companies and state institutions, he said. But it is unclear why they were patrolling at such a sensitive time. They were supposed to stay five days, but left after three to travel to Masvingo, in the south.

China's support for President Mugabe's regime has been highlighted by the arrival in South Africa of a ship carrying a large cache of weapons destined for Zimbabwe's armed forces. Dock workers in Durban refused to unload it.

The 300,000-strong South African Transport and Allied Workers Union (Satawu) said it would be "grossly irresponsible" to touch the cargo of ammunition, grenades and mortar rounds on board the Chinese ship An Yue Jiang anchored outside the port.

A Satawu spokesman Randall Howard said: "Our members employed at Durban container terminal will not unload this cargo, neither will any of our members in the truck-driving sector move this cargo by road. South Africa cannot be seen to be facilitating the flow of weapons into Zimbabwe at a time where there is a political dispute and a volatile situation between Zanu-PF and the MDC."

Three million rounds of AK-47 ammunition, 1,500 rocket-propelled grenades and more than 3,000 mortar rounds and mortar tubes are among the cargo on the Chinese ship, according to copies of the inventory published by a South African newspaper.

According to Beeld, the documentation for the shipment was completed on 1 April, three days after the presidential vote.

Zimbabwe and China have close military ties. Three years ago, Mr Mugabe signed extensive trade pacts with the Chinese as part of the "Look East" policy forced on him by his ostracising by Western governments over human rights abuses. The deal gave the Chinese mineral and trade concessions in exchange for economic help.

The shadow Foreign Secretary William Hague called on David Miliband to demand a cessation of arms shipments.

A South African government spokesman Themba Maseko said it would be difficult to stop the shipment.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/af...say-811796.html

3 Comments